Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998746›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Efficacy and safety of a particulate yeast β-glucan preparation in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (BETALL): a randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial protocol.

David Briskey, Janice Pellow, Gemma Beatson, Annie Tremblay, Amanda Rao, Thomas A Tompkins

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06907680 (A Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of M-Gard Particulate EW in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06907680 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of M-Gard Particulate EW in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRDC Clinical Pty LtdRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsAllergic Rhinitis Due to Grass PollensArmsM-Gard, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David BriskeyRDC Clinical, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Janice PellowRDC Clinical, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Gemma BeatsonRDC Clinical, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Annie TremblayLallemand Bio-Ingredients, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Amanda RaoRDC Clinical, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Thomas A TompkinsLallemand Bio-Ingredients, Montreal, QC, Canada. ttompkins@lallemand.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) has been shown to be a significant global health burden. Despite the existence of pharmacological treatments, mainly antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and decongestants, many individuals with seasonal allergies turn to alternative herbal medicines and nutritional supplements for the management of symptoms. The primary objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 500 mg daily dose of a yeast β-glucan preparation (M-Gard®) on reducing the severity of nasal and ocular symptoms in a population with seasonal AR.

methodsThis randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial will evaluate the effect of 500 mg of a 14-day M-Gard® or placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) supplementation period on the relief of grass pollen-induced AR symptoms in 20 generally healthy adults (18-65 years) with a history of recurrent seasonal AR. Participants will consume M-Gard® or placebo during 14 days, starting 12 days before the antigen challenge and ending 2 days after. Each supplementation period will be separated by a 2-week washout period. Allergy symptoms will be assessed at baseline (day 0) and on days 12-14 using a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating AR symptom severity as primary outcome (nasal congestion, sneezing, itchy nose, runny nose and watery eyes) and validated questionnaires as secondary outcomes (Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS), Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS), Rhinitis Control Scoring System (RCSS), and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)). In addition, onset of relief, use of rescue medication, and adverse events will be monitored for up to 2 days after the grass allergen challenge. Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and pathology markers (cytokines, histamine, tryptase, and allergen-specific IgE) will also be measured. All outcomes will be analysed as the change from baseline and between-group comparisons will be assessed using appropriate models. DISCUSSION: The study hypothesis is that M-Gard® supplementation will be more effective than placebo in reducing AR symptoms. This research will strengthen the evidence base supporting the use of M-Gard® as a supplement for the management of AR.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06907680. Registered on March 27, 2025.

Indexed as

Anti-Allergic Agentsbeta-GlucansRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-Allergic Agentsbeta-GlucansAllergic rhinitisAllergyGrass pollenM-Gard®PostbioticYeast β-glucan

Identifiers

PMID41998746
PMCPMC13218029

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.