Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998748›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026

Setting the research agenda for Council of Southern Africa Football Associations (COSAFA) women's football: stakeholder perspectives.

Fidelis Chibhabha, Fatou Binetou Ba Ndiaye, Menzi Obed Ngcobo, Nonhlanhla Sharon Mkumbuzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fidelis ChibhabhaLancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
Fatou Binetou Ba NdiayeFédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Member Associations Division, Paris, France.
Menzi Obed NgcoboHollywoodbets (PTY) Ltd, Durban, South Africa.
Nonhlanhla Sharon MkumbuziDepartment of Philosophy, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3HN, UK. nonhlanhla.s.mkumbuzi@durham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing global interest in women's football research, relatively less attention has been devoted to African women's football. Where research is conducted, the agenda tends to be driven by researchers usually without input from football stakeholders. Hence, research priorities may not reflect the needs of football stakeholders or address the real problems they face. Utilising the stakeholder theory framework, this cross-sectional study established self-reported medical and performance research priorities of stakeholders in women's football in the Council of Southern Africa Football Associations (COSAFA) region. A self-administered questionnaire ranking 17 areas of research was administered to women football players (≥18 years old), and their support personnel (e.g., coaches, medical personnel, administrators) participating in the 2022 TOTAL Energies CAF Women's Champions League (CAFWCL) COSAFA Qualifiers and 2022 COSAFA Women's Championship. One hundred and forty-one (n = 141) respondents from 10 countries participated. The top five research areas considered to be highly relevant to women's football in the COSAFA region were: (1) developing youth players (n = 115; 82%) (2), optimising physical conditioning (n = 112; 79%) (3), understanding female related health issues (n = 107; 76%) (4), improving technical skills (n = 106; 75%) (5), how to come back stronger after injury (n = 106;75%). Given a hypothetical USD $1 million research fund, stakeholders would prioritise (1) development of youth players (n = 70; 17%) (2), improvement of technical skills (n = 68; 16%), and (3) injury prevention (n = 33; 8%) as their top three areas for research focus. Identifying stakeholders' research priorities is important as this can inform research directions and funding priorities in African women's football.

Indexed as

AfricaFootball medicine researchResearch agendaStakeholder perspectivesWomen’s football

Identifiers

PMID41998748
PMCPMC13220478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.