ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Sport specific differences in upper limb median frequency responses during isometric push and pull tasks in volleyball and fitness athletes.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare sport-specific differences in upper-limb EMG median frequency (MF) responses during brief isometric push and pull tasks performed in seated and standing postures.
methodsThirty-six athletes (volleyball, n = 18; fitness, n = 18) performed 20-s isometric contractions in four conditions (seated upright row, seated shoulder press, standing upright row, standing shoulder press) using both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from the biceps brachii, triceps brachii, deltoid, and trapezius. MF was calculated using Welch’s method from a steady-state window (5–15 s of the 20-s contraction) to avoid onset and end-of-trial transients and expressed in Hz. Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) were used to test the effects of group, posture, action, and side.
resultsMF was higher during the upright row than the shoulder press for the biceps, deltoid, and trapezius (p < 0.001; within-subject dz = 0.59–1.02). For the triceps, significant effects of group (p = 0.019), posture (p = 0.026), and a group×posture interaction (p = 0.019) were observed, with fitness athletes showing higher MF than volleyball athletes particularly in the seated condition. No robust main effects or interactions involving side were detected.
conclusionIn these brief isometric tasks, MF responses were predominantly task-dependent (pull> push) for biceps, deltoid, and trapezius, whereas triceps MF showed sport- and posture-dependent modulation. These findings support the use of task-specific EMG spectral outcomes to compare neuromuscular characteristics across athletic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.