Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998925›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2026

Controlling tissue size by active fracture.

Wei Wang, Brian A Camley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei WangJohns Hopkins University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.
Brian A CamleyJohns Hopkins University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.

Funding

Physical insights into cell migrationR35GM142847 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Brian A Camley · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groups of cells, including clusters of cancerous cells, multicellular organisms, and developing organs, may both grow and break apart. What physical factors control these fractures? In these processes, what sets the eventual size of clusters? We first develop a one-dimensional framework for understanding cell clusters that can fragment due to cell motility using an active particle model. We compute analytically how the break rate of cell-cell junctions depends on cell speed, cell persistence, and cell-cell junction properties. Next, we find the cluster size distributions, which differ depending on whether all cells can divide or only the cells on the edge of the cluster divide. Cluster size distributions depend solely on the ratio of the break rate to the growth rate-allowing us to predict how cluster size and variability depend on cell motility and cell-cell mechanics. Our results suggest that organisms can achieve better size control when cell division is restricted to the cluster boundaries or when fracture can be localized to the cluster center. Additionally, we derive a universal survival probability for an intact cluster S(t)=e^{-k_{d}t} at steady state if all cells can divide, which is independent of the rupture kinetics and depends solely on the cell division rate k_{d}. Finally, we further corroborate the one-dimensional analytics with two-dimensional simulations, finding quantitative agreement with some-but not all-elements of the theory across a wide range of cell motility. Our results link the general physics problem of a collective active escape over a barrier to size control, providing a quantitative measure of how motility can regulate organ or organism size.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell DivisionCell MovementIntercellular JunctionsOrgan Size

Identifiers

PMID41998925
PMCPMC13094707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.