Trial reportEpilepsia2026
An n-of-1 gene-directed drug repurposing trial for an ultrarare genetic condition.
Trial report in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveGain-of-function (GoF) variants in the KCNC1 potassium channel subunit gene (Kv3.1) cause motor/cognitive delays and hypotonia and have been associated with seizures. Fluoxetine has inhibitory effects on Kv3.1. However, open-label nonrandomized administration is insufficient to guide clinical decision-making in ultrarare conditions. This 40-week randomized, double-blind, n-of-1 trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of fluoxetine for motor development in a 2-year, 10-month-old female child with a GoF KCNC1 variant.
methodsThis study used an ABA phase design (placebo-fluoxetine-placebo), with randomization and blinding of treatment transition moments. The active treatment, fluoxetine powder, was provided at 2.5 mg (low dose) and subsequently 5 mg (target dose) per day. Motor developmental was measured using the parent-reported Early Motor Questionnaire (EMQ), completed weekly. Secondary outcomes included cognitive and adaptive skills and other parent target symptoms (nystagmus, communication, purposeful hand movements).
resultsTreatment with fluoxetine was associated with a 6.61-point gain on the EMQ (95% credible interval [CrI] = -.53 to 14.78), beyond the effects of time (.52 points/week, 95% CrI = .28-.91). Treatment was well tolerated; possible withdrawal irritability emerged during the second placebo phase. A higher dose was associated with a larger treatment effect on the EMQ (2.5 mg = 6.81, 95% CrI = -.43 to 14.56; 5 mg = 8.68, 95% CrI = -4.29 to 21.76). Secondary outcomes showed significant improvements in purposeful hand movements (-.65, 95% CrI = -1.27 to -.003, on a 7-point scale), and there were small increases in adaptive behavior and cognitive skills during the trial. Clinical biomarkers suggested a shift toward increased excitation on electroencephalogram and electroretinogram. SIGNIFICANCE: Fluoxetine treatment was possibly associated with increased motor skill development in a young child with KCNC1-related disorder involving a GoF variant. Trials studying developmental endpoints require innovative designs; this study provides a template for treatment assessment in ultrarare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.