SynthesisCell transplantation
Evolution of mesenchymal stem cell therapies for traumatic brain injury: A decade of advances, mechanisms, and translational prospects.
Synthesis in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major global health challenge with limited effective treatments. This systematic review documents the significant evolution of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapies from traditional cell transplants to advanced cell-free products and engineered delivery systems. A systematic search was conducted across Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed/Medline for studies published from January 2015 to June 2025, resulting in the inclusion of 80 studies for qualitative synthesis. The review identifies four primary therapeutic mechanisms: reducing inflammation, protecting brain cells, maintaining the blood-brain barrier, and supporting tissue repair/regrowth. This PROSPERO-registered systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias were rigorously assessed using a multi-tool approach tailored to study design (Cochrane RoB, SYRCLE, NOS/JBI). Recent clinical evidence (e.g. STEMTRA trial) suggests these treatments are safe and can improve function in chronic TBI patients. Despite this, critical research gaps persist in establishing standardized protocols, optimal dosing, and long-term safety data. Emerging trends include (1) shifting toward enhanced exosomes/secretomes, (2) integrating MSCs/derivatives with advanced biomaterials for controlled delivery, (3) exploring alternative MSC sources, and (4) developing combination therapies. With a deepening mechanistic understanding and positive early clinical results, future research must prioritize standardization and personalized treatment plans to accelerate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.