Evidence mapPaperPMID 41999214Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026

Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery: Gender Insights From an Ultra-Fast-Track Protocol.

Sarah Berger Veith, Emre Polat, Christian Dumps, Philipp Simon, Julia Pochert, Evaldas Girdauskas, Sina Stock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah Berger VeithDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-9898-2394
Emre PolatDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-9810-0860
Christian DumpsAnesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.
Philipp SimonAnesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.
Julia PochertAnesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.
Evaldas GirdauskasDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1571-4244
Sina StockDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, Augsburg, Bavaria 86156, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUltra-fast-track (UFT) enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-defined by on-table extubation, minimally invasive surgical technique and de-escalated ICU care-represents an intensified ERAS approach. Female patients remain under-represented in cardiac surgery research and experience worse postoperative outcomes. Therefore, we investigated possible gender-mediated differences in the outcomes of our UFT-ERAS program.

methodsA total of 800 consecutive patients underwent UFT-ERAS for minimally invasive valve and aortic surgery at our institution from 01/2021 to 09/2024. Patients were divided by gender, and a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. The primary outcome was UFT-ERAS achievement, defined by a 0-5 score of postoperative milestones (on-table extubation, postoperative intermediate care, early physiotherapy, transfer to the general ward ≤24 h and hospital discharge ≤7 days). Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), reoperation for bleeding, reintubation, ICU readmission, acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, delirium and transfusion.

resultsWomen were older and had higher baseline risk scores. Overall, ERAS adherence and major postoperative complications were comparable between the sexes. Only discharge ≤7 days was less frequent, and postoperative transfusion need more frequent in women. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression adjusting for STS-PROM, age, and procedure type, sex was not independently associated with ERAS achievement (OR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.66-1.18).

conclusionsIn this predominantly low-risk patient cohort within a UFT-ERAS pathway, sex was not independently associated with overall ERAS achievement. However, women more frequently required transfusion and were less likely to be discharged within 7 days.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeenhanced recovery after surgeryERASfast trackgender disparitiessex disparitiesultra-fast-track

Identifiers

PMID41999214
PMCPMC13171216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.