ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026
Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery: Gender Insights From an Ultra-Fast-Track Protocol.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUltra-fast-track (UFT) enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-defined by on-table extubation, minimally invasive surgical technique and de-escalated ICU care-represents an intensified ERAS approach. Female patients remain under-represented in cardiac surgery research and experience worse postoperative outcomes. Therefore, we investigated possible gender-mediated differences in the outcomes of our UFT-ERAS program.
methodsA total of 800 consecutive patients underwent UFT-ERAS for minimally invasive valve and aortic surgery at our institution from 01/2021 to 09/2024. Patients were divided by gender, and a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. The primary outcome was UFT-ERAS achievement, defined by a 0-5 score of postoperative milestones (on-table extubation, postoperative intermediate care, early physiotherapy, transfer to the general ward ≤24 h and hospital discharge ≤7 days). Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), reoperation for bleeding, reintubation, ICU readmission, acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, delirium and transfusion.
resultsWomen were older and had higher baseline risk scores. Overall, ERAS adherence and major postoperative complications were comparable between the sexes. Only discharge ≤7 days was less frequent, and postoperative transfusion need more frequent in women. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression adjusting for STS-PROM, age, and procedure type, sex was not independently associated with ERAS achievement (OR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.66-1.18).
conclusionsIn this predominantly low-risk patient cohort within a UFT-ERAS pathway, sex was not independently associated with overall ERAS achievement. However, women more frequently required transfusion and were less likely to be discharged within 7 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.