ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
An AI framework for automated quality control of paraffin block and slide consistency: a clinical evaluation and human-machine comparison study.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consistency between paraffin blocks and corresponding histological slides is a key component of pathological quality control. In routine practice, verification is still largely based on manual visual comparison, which is both time-consuming and susceptible to human error. This study aims to develop a deep learning-based automated verification framework for reliable morphological matching between paraffin blocks and their histological slides. We retrospectively collected 2,220 paired paraffin block and histological slide images from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The AI framework integrates YOLOv11 for tissue detection and a Siamese network for feature matching. The AI framework demonstrated strong discriminative performance, achieving a mean AUC of 0.9809 in fivefold cross-validation. On the independent test set, the AI framework achieved an overall accuracy of 95.05%, significantly exceeding the average of 91.52% for manual verification. Subgroup analysis reached an accuracy of 98.01% for surgical resection specimens, and 88.77% for small biopsy specimens with limited morphological landmarks. Regarding efficiency, the AI processing time was < 0.05 s per slide, which was approximately 80 times faster than that of human verification. The AI framework also identified several mismatches that were missed by human reviewers. The proposed AI framework provides an efficient and more objective approach for block-slide consistency verification. The framework may serve as an automated screening tool that can support routine pathological quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999396What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.