ReviewAnnals of hematology2026
Modern and multidisciplinary care in polycythemia vera.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic, BCR::ABL1-negative, myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by increased hematocrit and platelet/leukocyte counts, as well as by a high risk of thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. The initial discovery of the JAK2V617F driver mutation, followed by a more in-depth knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate inflammation and iron homeostasis, significantly advanced our understanding of PV pathophysiology, paving the way for a shift from symptom-focused vs. biology-focused treatments. PV management is complex and should be individualized, considering age, comorbidities, clinical presentation, disease course, and patient preferences. As such, optimal care requires a dynamic approach involving coordinated collaboration among healthcare professionals, in order to reduce complications, and enhance patients’ quality of life and outcomes. This narrative review explores principles and benefits of integrated care for PV patients, illustrated through two representative clinical cases. We propose that a transdisciplinary approach be adopted throughout the diagnostic and therapeutic continuum for PV to optimize patient outcomes. The review also proposes a novel cytoreductive treatment algorithm in PV going beyond the conventional risk stratification based on patient’s age and history of thrombosis but rather focusing on patient’s characteristics and treatment needs. Finally, we examine ongoing clinical studies and the latest results and insights on PV therapies (including the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, the next-generation mono-pegylated type I interferon ropeginterferon alfa-2b, the iron metabolism modifiers and other experimental approaches) that could reshape the standard of care in PV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.