ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Created, Not Engineered: Analyzing Human Gene Editing from a Catholic Anthropological and Moral Perspective.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in human gene editing raise significant ethical questions concerning their compatibility with the Catholic Church's understanding of human dignity. This paper examines the Church's moral evaluation of human gene editing, particularly germline modifications, through its foundational principles of the dignity of the human person, the integrity of human nature as created in the imago Dei, the principle of solidarity, and the moral responsibility to exercise care rather than technological domination over human life. Employing the See-Judge-Act model, the study applies the Catholic moral framework to contemporary developments in gene editing, which are currently directed primarily toward the treatment of genetic diseases. The paper undertakes a doctrinal and hermeneutical analysis to assess whether such interventions respect or compromise inherent human dignity and then makes recommendations for concrete responses to the issue. Given the Catholic Church's global moral influence, clarifying its position helps delineate ethical boundaries between legitimate therapeutic intervention and unacceptable alteration of human nature. The study concludes that a Christian ethical response must take a future-oriented view in medicine, one that anticipates not only present therapeutic uses of gene editing but also emerging biotechnologies aimed at enhancement, redesign, and inheritable modification of the human genome, while firmly rejecting any form of genetic manipulation that transforms medicine from healing the person to engineering human nature itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999470What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.