Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41999526›Full record

Observational studyJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

Model-Based Prognostication and Symptom Distress in Patients with Advanced Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancers Receiving Best Supportive Care: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Sumith Surendran, Jayita Deodhar, Jyothsna Kuriakose, Shamali Poojary, K V Ganpathy, Raghu Thota

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sumith SurendranDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0203-3978
Jayita DeodharDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India. jukd2000@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-6695
Jyothsna KuriakoseDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-4952
Shamali PoojaryDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0285-7480
K V GanpathyDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1449-4641
Raghu ThotaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8945-2174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetastatic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancers often exhibit rapid and aggressive progression. Accurate prognostication is essential for aligning care objectives and preventing futile interventions. The Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) is a simple, validated bedside tool for advanced cancers, but its efficacy in metastatic HPB malignancies remains unassessed. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the PPI and to describe the symptom burden in this patient population.

methodsWe conducted a prospective observational cohort study of adults with metastatic HPB cancers referred for specialist palliative care from September 2022 to May 2023 who were not receiving any disease directed treatment. Baseline PPI scores were determined by palliative care physicians and survival was documented for 90 days. Symptom burden was assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). The prognostic performance of the PPI was evaluated using c-statistic and sensitivity-specificity analyses.

resultsAmong 145 participants, 123 (84.8%) died within 90 days. Median actual survival was 24 days (95% CI: 20.8–27.2). PPI showed good discrimination (c = 0.78 at 7 days, 0.71 at 21 days). Higher PPI categories were significantly associated with greater mortality risk (HR 2.61, 95% CI: 1.56–4.36). Performance status and presence of abdominal pain independently predicted mortality. Significant baseline symptom distress was seen, with modest alleviation after palliative care integration.

conclusionIn metastatic HPB cancers, PPI offers a practical and specific adjunct to clinical judgment for short-term survival estimation in palliative settings. Further validation in disease specific cohorts is needed to improve prognostic precision and guide care planning in patients with advanced cancer. TRN: CTRI/2022/08/044932 Date of registration:25/08/2022.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsPalliative CarePancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSymptom AssessmentSymptom BurdenMetastatic cancerPalliative carePalliative prognostic indexPrognosticationSymptom burden

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.