ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026
Ferroptosis and interstitial cystitis: a systematic review of preclinical evidence and molecular mechanisms.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic inflammatory bladder disorder with a poorly understood etiology and limited therapeutic options. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, has recently been implicated in bladder epithelial damage, suggesting a potential role in IC/BPS pathogenesis.
objectiveTo systematically review available preclinical studies examining the potential role of ferroptosis in experimental models relevant to interstitial cystitis, with a focus on molecular mechanisms and ferroptosis-related biomarkers.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A structured PICO framework was used to identify eligible preclinical studies that evaluated ferroptosis in animal models or ex vivo systems mimicking interstitial cystitis. Data were extracted regarding ferroptosis markers, signaling pathways, and therapeutic interventions.
resultsFour preclinical studies were included, involving rodent models of cyclophosphamide- and LPS-induced cystitis, cystitis glandularis, and one study incorporating human bladder biopsies. Across all studies, ferroptosis was consistently associated with bladder injury, characterized by decreased expression of GPX4 and SLC7A11, elevated malondialdehyde (MDA), and increased lipid ROS. Key regulatory pathways involved included Wnt/β-catenin, NF-κB, and Nrf2. Ferroptosis inhibitors such as dexrazoxane, hydrogen sulfide donors, dietary restriction, and pachymic acid attenuated bladder damage by restoring redox homeostasis. None of the studies evaluated pain-related outcomes or functional bladder parameters, which limits the translational interpretation of findings in the context of IC/BPS symptomatology.
conclusionsThis systematic review highlights ferroptosis as a compelling mechanistic link between chronic inflammation and urothelial injury in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Targeting ferroptosis may offer a novel disease-modifying strategy in a condition where current treatments remain largely symptomatic. Future translation into clinical settings could involve biomarker-guided phenotyping and intravesical delivery of ferroptosis-modulating agents to achieve localized and pathogenesis-based therapy. However, given the limited number of studies and the lack of human validation, these findings should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999537What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.