ReviewJournal of medical systems2026
Artificial Intelligence For 6P Medicine: Consolidating AI Needs of Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory, Precision, and Public Health Trajectories.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare, and it aligns naturally with the 6P medicine model (predictive, preventive, personalized, participatory, precision, and public health). In this narrative review, we synthesize recent evidence on how AI methods-including machine learning, deep learning, large language models, and digital twins-support each “P”, and we highlight where evidence is mature versus still exploratory. Across the literature, the strongest evidence focuses on predictive, preventive, and precision applications (e.g., imaging, risk stratification, and treatment decision support). In contrast, participatory and public health applications are less consistently evaluated and introduce additional challenges around equity, trust, and governance. We propose a practical 6P-AI implementation blueprint that links common use cases to data requirements, workflow integration steps, evaluation designs, and post-deployment monitoring. Responsible adoption requires attention to data quality, privacy, bias mitigation, transparency, human oversight, and alignment with regulatory frameworks (e.g., the European Health Data Space and the EU AI Act).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41999547What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.