Observational studyESC heart failure2026
Endothelial and inflammatory responses during ex vivo normothermic perfusion of human cardiac grafts.
Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsNormothermic ex vivo heart perfusion (NEVHP) allows functional assessment and preservation of donor hearts, but the biological responses occurring during perfusion are not well characterized. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of sequential biomarker monitoring during human cardiac NEVHP and described inflammatory, endothelial, and haemostatic responses over time. METHODS AND
resultsThis single-centre, prospective, observational pilot study included five consecutive donor hearts preserved with the TransMedics Organ Care System (OCS) at the University Hospital of Rennes between March 2021 and January 2023. OCS use was indicated for expected cold ischaemia >4 h or surgical complexity. Perfusate samples were collected after priming (T0), at 10 min (T1), 60 min (T2), and before cooling (T3). Cytokines, chemokines, endothelial markers, and haemostatic factors were quantified by multiplex immunoassay and ELISA. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models and expressed as fold-change vs T0. Donor median age was 44 years (IQR 36-50) and 60% male. All grafts were transplanted. Recipient mean age was 53 ± 9 years and 20% female. Two of five (40%) developed severe primary graft dysfunction. Sequential sampling was successful in all perfusions. Inflammatory mediators rose during perfusion: at T3 vs T0, IL-8 increased 11.5-fold (95% CI 6.5-20.1), bFGF 8.4-fold (6.7-10.5), IL-6 4.5-fold (2.4-8.2), and MCP-1/CCL2 4.1-fold (2.6-6.6). IL-10 and TNF-α showed smaller increases (2.0- and 1.6-fold). Leukocyte counts remained stable (0.57 × 109/L at T0; fold-change 0.9). Endothelial markers showed activation without evidence of injury. Angiopoietin-2 increased 1.6-fold (1.2-2.1) and VEGF 2.0-fold (1.2-3.5), while angiopoietin-1, syndecan-1, soluble E-selectin, thrombomodulin, VEGFR2, PlGF, and vWF:Ag showed minimal or inconsistent changes. These trajectories are consistent with endothelial activation in the absence of glycocalyx shedding or structural disruption. Despite high heparin levels (median 6.9 IU/ml), low-grade haemostatic activation occurred. D-dimer increased 1.9-fold (1.3-2.7), fibrin monomer 2.2-fold (1.2-3.9), and soluble P-selectin 1.5-fold (1.1-2.0). Platelet counts declined to 0.8 (0.7-0.9) relative to baseline. Haematocrit decreased slightly (15.5% to 14.6%, fold-change 0.94), consistent with mild haemodilution.
conclusionSequential biomarker monitoring during NEVHP was feasible and demonstrated inflammatory, endothelial, and haemostatic changes. These biological patterns require confirmation in larger cohorts, as potential tools for graft assessment and optimization of perfusion circuits and perfusate composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.