ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Development and validation of clinical phenotypes in sepsis-associated liver injury using multi-algorithm consensus classification: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-associated liver injury (SALI) is a heterogeneous syndrome with high mortality and pathophysiological heterogeneity. Current prognostic models are limited in their ability to capture the heterogeneity in pathophysiology, highlighting the demand for improved stratification of patient subgroups and the development of personalized therapeutic strategies.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of ICU patients diagnosed with SALI from 2001 to 2022. The research included 5,755 adult patients obtained from four databases, utilizing the eICU-CRD cohort (n = 3,893) for initial exploration and three independent cohorts (NWICU-1.0, MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV; n = 1,862) for subsequent validation. We developed and utilized a novel Multi-algorithm Consensus-based Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury Classification (MCSALIC) method that integrates ten clustering algorithms. This technique identified four distinct SALI phenotypes. phenotypes were subsequently validated and characterized through XGBoost-based SHAP analysis and survival analysis, which elucidated essential distinguishing features and variability in treatment response.
resultsphenotypes A (47.9%, liver preservation), B (22.6%, hyperbilirubinemia), C (16.7%, hepatocellular dysfunction), and D (12.8%, cholestasis) were delineated. In the development cohort, phenotypes C and D had higher 30-day mortality rates than phenotype A (HR = 1.44 and 1.32, respectively). There was no significant difference between phenotypes A and B. In SALI, therapeutic responses were specific to phenotypes. Patients with phenotype A experienced advantages from early antibiotic treatment alongside moderate fluid resuscitation. Patients with phenotype B benefited from immediate antibiotics, limited fluids, and low-dose norepinephrine. Patients with phenotype C benefited from a moderate fluid range, low-dose norepinephrine, and relatively lenient antibiotic initiation. Patients with phenotype D benefited from high-volume fluid resuscitation, high-dose norepinephrine administration, and relatively lenient antibiotic timing.
conclusionsSALI consists of four distinct phenotypes, each characterized by unique pathophysiology, prognostic outcomes, and treatment responses. This stratification, strongly validated across international cohorts, sets the stage for precision medicine and calls into question the current one-size-fits-all approach to treatment. CLINICAL TIRAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.