ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Perceptions of gestational weight gain in Turkish women: a qualitative study guided by a socio-ecological model.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal body weight, nutrition, and lifestyle are critical indicators of both maternal and fetal health. Gestational weight gain (GWG) that deviates from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity among Turkish women of reproductive age, qualitative evidence regarding their GWG experiences remains limited. Using a qualitative approach guided by the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), this study aimed to explore women’s perceptions, experiences, and behaviors regarding weight gain during pregnancy, as well as the facilitators and barriers influencing weight management.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study using reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eighteen Turkish pregnant women recruited through purposive sampling with maximum variation from two Family Health Centers in Izmir, Türkiye. Data analysis was performed using MAXQDA software, utilizing both deductive (SEM-guided) and inductive coding strategies. Inductive codes were generated from participant narratives and subsequently organized into themes within the four levels of the SEM framework, adhering to the principles of reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThe interview data were categorized according to the four SEM levels. At the intrapersonal level, participants demonstrated awareness of healthy GWG but often held inaccurate perceptions of their own Body Mass Index (BMI) status. At the interpersonal level, family pressure around “eating for two” was a prominent barrier, though participants largely rejected this myth. At the community/social level, participants reported inadequate individualized counseling from healthcare providers. At the environmental level, financial constraints and social exclusion were identified as structural barriers.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that GWG behaviors in Turkish pregnant women are shaped by multiple, interacting factors across all SEM levels. The findings underscore the necessity for routine, individualized GWG counseling at every antenatal visit, family-inclusive nutritional guidance, and workplace accommodations for pregnant women. Future interventions should address the multilevel nature of these influences to effectively support healthy weight management during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.