ArticleBMC surgery2026
InSafeLOCK intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral diaphyseal fractures: a retrospective cohort study with 24-month outcomes.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated, in humeral diaphyseal fractures, how the InSafeLOCK intramedullary nail (IMN) compares with limited-contact dynamic compression plating (LC-DCP) in terms of radiologic and functional outcomes. The InSafeLOCK incorporates an internal, unicortical distal-locking feature intended to streamline distal fixation and potentially reduce neurovascular risk; however, its clinical performance has not previously been directly compared with conventional plating.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 93 adults who underwent surgery for humeral diaphyseal fractures between January 2016 and January 2023. Patients were treated with LC-DCP (n = 58; median age 43.5 years [IQR 29.3–69.8]) or the InSafeLOCK IMN (n = 35; median age 53.0 years [IQR 37.0–68.0]). Radiographic union, complications, and functional outcomes (DASH, ASES, Constant, and VAS) were assessed at 24 months; total follow-up duration beyond 24 months was recorded descriptively.
resultsMedian union time among fractures that achieved union was 13 weeks (IQR 11–15) after LC-DCP and 12 weeks (IQR 11–15) after IMN (p = 0.401). Nonunion occurred in 3/58 patients (5.2%) after LC-DCP and 1/35 (2.9%) after IMN (risk ratio 1.81; 95% CI 0.20–16.73; Fisher’s exact p = 1.00). Two transient iatrogenic radial nerve palsies occurred after plating (2/58, 3.4%) and none after IMN (0/35, 0.0%); the absolute risk difference was 3.4% (95% CI − 8.9 to 11.7) (Fisher’s exact p = 0.53). At 24 months, DASH, ASES, Constant, and VAS scores were similar between groups (all p > 0.05).
conclusionIn this retrospective cohort, InSafeLOCK IMN and LC-DCP plating were associated with comparable radiographic and 24-month functional outcomes. Because complication events were infrequent and treatment allocation was nonrandomized, comparative safety conclusions should be interpreted cautiously. Larger prospective studies are needed to better define the role of internal distal locking systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.