Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42002604›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Risk stratification of patients with syncope in the emergency department using ECG based artificial intelligence models.

Asger Knudsen, Johannes Jan Struijk, Sam Riahi, Mikkel Porsborg Andersen, Helle Collatz Christensen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Kristian Kragholm, Jørgen K Kanters, Christoffer Polcwiartek, Claus Graff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Asger KnudsenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. asgerek@hst.aau.dk.
Johannes Jan StruijkDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sam RiahiDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mikkel Porsborg AndersenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Helle Collatz ChristensenPrehospital Center, Region Zealand, Naestved, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenCopenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Kristian KragholmDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jørgen K KantersLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoffer PolcwiartekDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Claus GraffDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syncope is a common presentation in the emergency department, yet risk stratification for adverse events remains a substantial clinical challenge. In this study, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) models for identification of patients at high risk of 1-year cardiovascular death was investigated. The study included 39,735 patients aged 18 years or older who presented to a Danish emergency department with a discharge diagnosis of syncope and had an electrocardiogram recorded on the same day. Using multiple electrocardiogram parameters four different models were developed - artificial neural network, logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting. Additionally, the models’ ability to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups of 1-year cardiovascular death was assessed. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.85 (0.01), while the mean area under the precision-recall curve was 0.11 (0.01). Stratification into low- and high-risk groups showed hazard ratios ranging from 10.80 (95% CI, 8.55–13.63) to 17.97 (95% CI, 12.32–26.20) in univariate Cox Proportional Hazards regression analysis across the four models. These findings demonstrate that AI-based models can successfully distinguish high-risk from low-risk patients with syncope, allowing for targeted evaluation and efficient clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalSyncopeAdultAgedDenmarkEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRandom ForestRisk AssessmentROC CurveArtificial intelligenceECGEmergency departmentRisk stratificationSyncope

Identifiers

PMID42002604
PMCPMC13253819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.