Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42003096›Full record

ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2026

Bridging Clinical and Chemical Research in Occupational Asthma.

Xi-Ming Yuan

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xi-Ming YuanOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58185, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational Asthma (OA) accounts for a significant portion of adult asthma cases and is driven by diverse mechanisms linked to high- and low-molecular-weight workplace exposures. Despite extensive clinical and epidemiological studies, the molecular basis and medicinal chemistry approaches for diagnosing and managing OA remain underexplored. Here, I review the current literature identifying key occupational exposures, emphasizing the paucity of medicinal chemistry research targeting OA-related exposures. I advocate for translational research that integrates innovations in medicinal chemistry with clinical insights, leveraging exposomics to develop personalized exposure assessments and targeted therapeutics. The interdisciplinary approach involving chemical exposomes holds promise for improved OA prevention, diagnosis, and management tailored to specific occupational exposures and patient needs.

Indexed as

AsthmaAsthma, OccupationalHumansOccupational ExposureExposomeexposomicsexposuresIgEmedicinal chemistryoccupational asthmasensitization

Identifiers

PMID42003096

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.