ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2026
Modified Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With Neurological Deficits: Technical Description and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficits require decompression and stabilization. The spinous process-splitting approach (SPSA) achieves neural decompression while preserving the posterior osteoligamentous complex and minimizing paraspinal muscle injury.
objectiveAlthough various posterior surgical techniques are available for thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficits, achieving adequate neural decompression while maximally preserving the posterior osteoligamentous complex remains technically challenging; a standardized approach that balances sufficient decompression with posterior structural preservation is still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to describe a modified SPSA combining the Wiltse interval with spinous process splitting for decompression, and to preliminarily evaluate its feasibility, safety, and early clinical and radiographic outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed seven consecutive male patients who underwent posterior fixation, decompression, and fusion via modified SPSA between January 2020 and December 2024. Outcomes included American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Gardner angle, anterior vertebral height ratio, and spinal canal encroachment ratio, assessed preoperatively, at 1 week postoperatively, and at 14 ± 2 months. Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed (α = 0.05).
resultsAll procedures were completed successfully with mean operative time of 172.1 ± 95.7 min. All patients improved by at least one ASIA grade postoperatively, with no neurological deterioration. VAS scores decreased from 6.86 ± 0.90 preoperatively to 3.29 ± 0.49 at 1 week, and to 1.14 ± 0.38 at final follow-up (F = 350.00, p < 0.01). Gardner angle improved from 19.63° ± 8.92° to 4.39° ± 4.08° and remained stable at 4.69° ± 4.27° (F = 54.65, p < 0.01). Anterior vertebral height ratio increased from 51.82% ± 1.20% to 91.96% ± 7.93% and was maintained at 91.30% ± 8.13% (F = 89.41, p < 0.01). Spinal canal encroachment decreased from 62.32% ± 14.90% to 16.42% ± 10.78% postoperatively and remained stable at 16.89% ± 11.54% (F = 48.49, p < 0.01). All fractures achieved radiographic union without loss of correction.
conclusionsModified SPSA combining the Wiltse interval and midline spinous process splitting appears feasible for achieving decompression, reduction, and fixation while preserving posterior structures in selected patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures and neurological deficits. Larger prospective comparative studies are required to confirm long-term efficacy and define optimal patient selection criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.