ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Enhancing High-Resolution Assessment in Pain Disorders: Development of an Adaptive Real-Time Version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) scores have consistently been associated with heightened pain perception and poorer treatment outcomes. However, the PCS is typically administered as a trait-level measure and does not capture within-day fluctuations in pain-related cognitions. With increasing interest in real-time monitoring through Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), there is a need for reliable and efficient instruments suitable for repeated use without inducing response fatigue or bias.
methodsThe German version of the 13-item PCS was adapted using minimal linguistic modifications for momentary assessment. Based on a cross-sectional design, the original and EMA versions were administered to 691 and 1440 patients, who reported pain within the last week. Using Item Response Theory (IRT), we modeled item characteristics, confirmed unidimensionality, and developed three 4-item short forms to enable efficient and balanced assessment. In addition, we conducted computer-adaptive testing (CAT) simulations to examine expected measurement precision and item exposure effects under repeated adaptive use.
resultsThe adapted PCS showed strong essential unidimensionality and high item discrimination. All short forms achieved high measurement precision across a broad range of symptom severity. CAT simulations confirmed high precision for initial assessments, though performance declined with repeated use due to the limited item pool.
conclusionThis study provides an initial psychometric evaluation of a momentary-adaptive PCS using IRT-based short forms and CAT simulations. Adaptive administration improved efficiency in early assessments but requires further validation in real-world EMA designs to establish longitudinal performance and applied utility. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study introduces an adaptive, real-time version of the PCS optimized for ecological momentary assessment. By combining IRT-based short forms and computer-adaptive testing, the approach enhances measurement precision while reducing burden in repeated assessments. These findings represent a methodological step toward high-resolution monitoring of PCS-based pain-related cognitions in clinical and mobile health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.