ReviewMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2026
Reprogramming innate immunity through viral interference: A double-edged strategy for enhancing and containing gene therapies.
Review in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral vectors have transformed gene therapy by enabling efficient and targeted delivery of therapeutics. However, the efficacy and safety of viral vector-based therapies are frequently constrained by host innate immune responses. Sensing of viral capsids, vector genomes, and transgene-derived nucleic acids activates inflammatory and type I interferon signaling, leading to transgene silencing, vector clearance, and immune-mediated loss of transduced cells, particularly at the high vector doses required for clinical efficacy. In contrast, natural viruses have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to evade or modulate these innate immune pathways, enabling sustained gene expression and persistence. This review examines the molecular basis of innate immune sensing of commonly used viral vectors and highlights viral immune evasion strategies as an underexplored resource for therapeutic design. We discuss how repurposing viral immunomodulatory elements-through vector-intrinsic engineering and transient co-delivery-can desensitize innate signaling pathways, thereby enhancing gene transfer while preserving host immune surveillance. Extending these principles beyond viral vectors, we consider their relevance to non-viral platforms, including lipid nanoparticles, polymeric carriers, and exosomes. By reframing viral immune evasion as a therapeutic opportunity rather than a liability, we outline new directions for safer and more effective gene delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.