ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026
Consumption of antioxidant-rich foods attenuates respiratory and cardiovascular health effects in a population highly exposed to air pollution.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diet and nutrition have shown promise in attenuating air pollution health effects. However, to date, no study has been conducted in an occupationally exposed population who experience high levels of very complex air pollution mixtures on a daily basis. Objectives: We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of regular consumption of antioxidant-rich foods in attenuating respiratory and cardiovascular health effects among street vendors in Accra, Ghana. Methods: We used a quasi-experimental design of 12-month duration, assigning 307 street vendors to either an intervention group (n = 155) to receive a weekly supply of antioxidant-rich foods or a control group (n = 152) who maintained their usual dietary pattern. Participants regularly consuming antioxidant-rich foods were assigned to the intervention group, with those consuming less of these foods assigned to the control group. Results: In the multivariable ordinal multinomial logistic regression model controlling for age, gender, educational level, and body mass index, the intervention participants were found to have reduced odds of cough (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.63), difficulty breathing (AOR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.65), irregular heartbeat (AOR = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.13), and hospital visits (AOR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.72) compared with the control participants. Surprisingly, we observed a decline in lung function among the intervention participants compared with the control participants. Conclusions: We found regular consumption of antioxidant-rich foods to attenuate adverse air pollution health effects among this vulnerable population. Risk communication among this group and other outdoor workers should emphasize this nutrition intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.