Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42004169›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging2026

The utility of psychometric network analysis for the study of social isolation, loneliness, and social support in persons with cancer: methodology and future directions.

Thomas V Merluzzi, Andrea Chirico, Tommaso Palombi, Errol J Philip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas V MerluzziDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Andrea ChiricoDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso PalombiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Errol J PhilipSchool of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been well-established that social isolation, loneliness, and inadequate social support are critical determinants of psychological and physical outcomes in persons with cancer. In contrast to latent variable analysis, upon which most current research is based, psychometric network analysis offers a framework for understanding how these social factors relate to specific symptoms, coping resources, and wellbeing in the context of cancer. Although very few studies in this area of research have used network analysis methods, this presentation focuses on a small number of recent network-analytic studies in oncology and other related examples, emphasizing methodological choices, stability procedures, interpretation of centrality indicators, and global network analyses. In addition, recommendations are presented for future research, such as longitudinal models, network analysis of interventions, and multifaceted data integration that might inform translational work in psycho-oncology. Psychometric network analysis holds strong potential to advance psychosocial oncology through the identification of specific modifiable targets that might help mitigate social isolation, loneliness, and inadequate support.

Indexed as

cancerlonelinessnetwork analysissocial isolationsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42004169
PMCPMC13083192

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.