ArticleDigital health
A multidimensional eye-tracking assessment for estimating cognitive profiles in intellectual disability: A preliminary deep learning study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The current diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID) in children relies on resource-intensive assessments by experts, limiting their use for widespread estimation. Eye-tracking offers a potential digital biomarker, but its application to the multifaceted cognitive profile of ID remains scarce. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel eye-tracking assessment combined with deep learning as an automated tool for estimating cognitive capacity of ID. Methods: We developed three cognitive subtasks to elicit spatio-temporal gaze patterns related to three subindices including verbal comprehension (VCI), fluid reasoning (FRI), and working memory (WMI). With data collected from seven children with ID and nine typically developing (TD) children, we compared a logistic regression (LR) model using predefined gaze metrics and behavioral features with a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained directly on raw scanpath images to classify participants. Results: The CNN model demonstrated superior performance, achieving a 0.93 F1-score in subject-level classification, while the feature-based LR model achieved a 0.76 F1-score. Notably, the CNN predictions derived from the working memory task significantly correlated with full-scale IQ as well as FRI and visuospatial (VSI) subscores, suggesting the model effectively captured higher-order reasoning and visuospatial processes. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that deep learning analysis of spatio-temporal gaze patterns from a multidimensional cognitive task can serve as a robust digital biomarker, paving the way for accessible and objective tools for estimating cognitive capacity in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.