ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2026
Space Physiology and Technology: Adaptations, Countermeasures, and Opportunities for Wearable Systems.
Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, Modeling and Performance Analysis of an Actively Variable Stiffness Pneumatic Flexible Bending Joint.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Haptic Feedback Reduces Telesurgery Operators' Reaction Times Compared to Conventional Stimulation: Results of a First-in-Human Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Shoulder Assistive Exoskeleton for Insulator Replacement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heatwave Exposure Accelerates Biological Aging via Metabolic Dysregulation.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- From Earth to orbit: cardiovascular innovation diffusion to space medicine - an updated review incorporating a novel predictive modeling framework.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Space poses substantial challenges for humans, leading to physiological adaptations in response to an environment vastly different from Earth. A comprehensive understanding of these physiological adaptations is necessary to develop effective countermeasures that support human life in space. This narrative review first focuses on the impact of the space environment on the musculoskeletal system. It highlights the complex interplay between bone and muscle adaptations and their implications on astronaut health. Despite advances in current countermeasures, such as resistive exercise and pharmacological interventions, they remain partially effective, bulky, and resource-intensive, posing challenges for future missions aboard compact spacecraft. This review proposes wearable sensing and robotic technologies as promising alternatives to overcome these limitations. Wearable systems, such as sensor-integrated suits and (soft) exoskeletons, can provide real-time monitoring, dynamic loading, and exercise protocols tailored to individual needs. These systems are lightweight, modular, and capable of operating in confined environments, making them ideal for long-duration missions. In addition to space applications, wearable technologies hold considerable promise for terrestrial uses. They could support rehabilitation and assistance for the aging population and individuals with musculoskeletal disorders, and enhance physical performance in healthy users. By integrating advanced materials, sensors, actuators, and intelligent, energy-efficient control, these technologies can bridge gaps in current countermeasures while enabling broader applications on Earth.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.