SynthesisPeerJ2026
Vitamin D supplementation in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effects on semen quality and endocrine function.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on semen parameters, reproductive hormones and fertility outcomes in infertile men. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase for studies published within the last 10 years. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating oral vitamin D supplementation in infertile men and reporting semen parameters, reproductive hormones and/or fertility outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (observational studies). Results: Eleven studies (eight RCTs and three observational studies; Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation may improve selected semen parameters and testosterone levels in infertile men, particularly progressive sperm motility. However, current evidence does not demonstrate improved clinical fertility outcomes, and higher doses (>4,000 IU/day) do not appear to confer additional benefits. Larger, well-designed trials with standardized fertility endpoints are needed to confirm clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.