ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Emergency preservation and resuscitation in exsanguination cardiac arrest: science fiction to future reality?
Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH), leading to exsanguination cardiac arrest, remains the primary cause of preventable death in combat trauma. As the future operational environment shifts toward large-scale combat operations (LSCO) with delayed evacuations and increased casualty volumes, existing damage control strategies may prove inadequate due to limited resources and delayed evacuation. In 1984, US Army Colonel Ronald Bellamy challenged military medicine to develop new interventions for hemorrhagic shock, emphasizing the need for technologies that could 'buy time' for evacuation and surgical intervention. Decades later, Emergency Preservation and Resuscitation (EPR), which induces a hypometabolic state through profound hypothermia, offers a potential solution to this problem. This review summarizes the historical evolution of the EPR concept, from early military observations to modern preclinical and clinical advancements in EPR. We explore emerging technologies, such as portable extracorporeal life support systems (eg, MobyBox and CARL), organ perfusion platforms (BrainEx and OrganEx) and adjunctive pharmacologic agents (eg, Frunexian, PEG-20K, TAT-PHLPP9c and mitochondrial transplantation), that can enhance the efficacy of EPR, leading to optimized organ recovery. These innovations provide a foundation for developing resource-expedient EPR capabilities tailored for future battlefields. By synthesizing current evidence and examining the military context of prolonged casualty care, this paper outlines how EPR could meet Bellamy's challenge and serve as a next-generation tool for combat casualty care. As military medicine prepares for future conflicts, EPR may provide a critical capability to reduce mortality from NCTH and revolutionize combat trauma management in LSCO scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.