ReviewFrontiers in physiology2026
Comparative efficacy and mechanistic insights of non-invasive neuromodulation and motor rehabilitation on functional reorganization of the supplementary motor area in subacute stroke: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of non-invasive neural stimulation modalities on upper limb function in subacute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Cross-Segmental Transfer Effects of Lower Limb Cross-Training Priming on Upper Extremity Functional Recovery in Pediatric Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing efficacy and safety of dynamic scalp acupuncture for post-stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subacute stroke patients frequently experience significant motor impairment. The supplementary motor area (SMA), a critical hub for motor control and functional brain reorganization, plays a pivotal role in recovery. However, traditional interventions such as drug therapy and conventional physical therapy often lack the spatial precision and causal efficacy required for directly and accurately remodeling specific dysfunctional circuits like the SMA in subacute stroke, which results in key challenges in current rehabilitation practice for correcting specific network imbalances and efficiently inducing task-related plasticity. This narrative review elucidates how two advanced, mechanism-driven strategies address these challenges. Non-invasive neuromodulation provides a precise top-down intervention method that can directly regulate the cortical excitability of SMA and its related networks, correcting pathological network imbalances, which is unmatched by traditional methods. In contrast, motor rehabilitation provides a powerful bottom-up, experience-dependent intervention that drives Hebbian plasticity through intensive, task-oriented training, specifically enhancing SMA activation and functional connectivity. Crucially, the major innovation lies in their strategic combination. Non-invasive neuromodulation primes the brain network for learning, while motor rehabilitation consolidates the induced plasticity, thereby yielding synergistic effects that maximize functional recovery. This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of these interventions in promoting SMA reorganization following subacute stroke, analyzing their impacts on network modulation, neuroimaging correlates, and clinical outcomes. By integrating foundational research and clinical insights, it aims to establish a theoretical framework for refining precision, network-targeted rehabilitation strategies for post-stroke motor deficits in the subacute phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.