Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005401›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026

Clinical implementation of 3D deep learning techniques in predicting touch-up lesions for atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cryoablation.

Chih-Min Liu, Wei-Wen Chen, Shih-Lin Chang, Chien-Chao Tseng, Ching-Chun Huang, Yenn-Jiang Lin, Li-Wei Lo, Yu-Feng Hu, Fa-Po Chung, Ting-Yung Chang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chih-Min LiuDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Wen ChenInstitute of Computer Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Shih-Lin ChangDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Chao TsengInstitute of Computer Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Ching-Chun HuangInstitute of Computer Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yenn-Jiang LinDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Wei LoDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Feng HuDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Fa-Po ChungDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Yung ChangDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chin-Yu LinDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tze-Fan ChaoDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ta-Chuan TuanDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jo-Nan LiaoDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ling KuoDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-I WuDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shin-Huei LiuDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jacky Chung-Hao WuCenter for Fundamental Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Henry Horng-Shing LuBiomedical Artificial Intelligence Academy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shih-Ann ChenDivision of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that can be treated with cryoballoon ablation (CBA). CBA occasionally requires additional radiofrequency-based touch-up ablation due to anatomical challenges. This study developed a 3D deep learning model to predict the complexity of CBA procedures and potentially reduce subsequent interventions, minimizing increased procedure times, costs, risks, and patient discomfort. Methods: We included 190 AF patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) scans at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from November 2014 to October 2020, divided into touch-up and non-touch-up groups. An 80:20 ratio was used to allocate patients to training and test sets, with an independent external validation set comprising 99 patients from October 2020 to August 2023. Three artificial intelligence (AI) models, PointNet, VoxNet, and an advanced version, CryoAI (VoxNet++), were developed to predict the need for touch-up ablation from 3D voxel-reconstructed CT images. Results: CryoAI demonstrated the best overall discriminative performance among the tested models, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 84.07% in the internal test set, with a high positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.15%. In external validation, CryoAI maintained high performance with a PPV of 95.77%. Using a 60° curvature cutoff, all touch-up sites were localized to above-threshold regions in both the internal (n = 8) and external (n = 9) cohorts. Integrating Grad-CAM and a Gaussian Curvature module within our 3D Activation Visualization highlights critical zones for cryoballoon positioning and potential touch-up lesions, enhancing pre-procedural planning. Conclusions: The CryoAI model demonstrates promising discriminative ability for predicting the need for RF touch-up ablation in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

3D activation visualization3D Gaussian curvatureArtificial intelligenceAtrial fibrillationCryoballoon ablationTouch-up ablation

Identifiers

PMID42005401
PMCPMC13087757

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.