Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005542›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2026

Assessing endometrial microbiota in endometriosis: culturomics and sequencing analysis of receptive-phase tissue.

A Canha-Gouveia, C M Tenorio, T Rööp, S Kõljalg, I Smidt, E Sepp, J Štšepetova, M Saare, S Vela, I Pérez-Prieto and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

A Canha-GouveiaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
C M TenorioDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
T RööpDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
S KõljalgDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
I SmidtDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
E SeppDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
J ŠtšepetovaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
M SaareCelvia CC AS, Tartu, Estonia.
S VelaCelvia CC AS, Tartu, Estonia.
I Pérez-PrietoIVI-RMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia 46026, Spain.
E VargasSystems Biology Unit, Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain.
J MozasInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
A ClaveroInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
A Sola-LeyvaCelvia CC AS, Tartu, Estonia.
A SalumetsCelvia CC AS, Tartu, Estonia.
R MändarDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine- University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
S AltmäeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis has been associated with alterations in the reproductive tract microbiota, yet studies focusing on the endometrial microbiome remain inconsistent, partly due to the low-biomass nature of this niche and methodological heterogeneity. In this prospective pilot study, we investigated whether the receptive-phase endometrial microbiota differs between women with and without endometriosis using a combined culturomics and 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Endometrial samples were collected from 20 women undergoing fertility assessment, including 10 women with a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and 10 controls with male factor infertility. Biopsies were used for culturomics and Tao brush samples for sequencing, both obtained during the mid-secretory phase. Viable bacterial growth was recovered from 19 of 20 biopsies, yielding approximately 2500 colonies corresponding to 40 non-redundant species. Direct plating and aerobic pre-incubation shared around 45% of detected species, with pre-incubation enhancing species recovery but limiting quantitative comparisons. Bacterial load estimated from direct cultures showed wide inter-individual variability and no significant differences between groups, consistent with 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, which also revealed no clear differences in microbial diversity or overall community composition within this cohort. Only a limited overlap was observed between taxa detected by culture and sequencing, highlighting the complementarity and methodological biases of each approach. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of recovering viable bacteria from receptive-phase endometrial samples and supports the combined use of culturomics and sequencing as complementary tools for studying microbiota in low-biomass uterine environments. These findings should, however, be interpreted considering the exploratory design and limited sample size.

Indexed as

CulturomicsEndometriosisEndometriumMicrobiomeMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID42005542
PMCPMC13091524

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.