ArticleSSM - population health2026
Adolescent loneliness in the United States: Prevalence, sociodemographic correlates, and psychological health over time.
Article in SSM - population health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward a transdiagnostic modifier for clinically significant loneliness in psychiatry: a conceptual mini review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loneliness is a public health concern, but its epidemiology in U.S. adolescence remains poorly described. Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (analytic N = 6067), we estimated the prevalence of loneliness at approximately age 14 and tested whether sociodemographic characteristics and psychological health were associated with later loneliness. Adolescents self-reported how often they felt lonely ("not lonely," "sometimes," "often"). Caregivers reported adolescents' psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity, conduct, oppositional defiant, somatic) annually from baseline through Year 3. We estimated linear mixed-effects growth models to obtain person-specific intercepts (midpoint symptom level) and slopes (rate of change) and then used these trajectories as predictors of loneliness in multilevel ordinal models. Prevalence estimates indicated that 8.9% of adolescents reported being "often lonely," 31.6% "sometimes lonely," and 59.5% "not lonely." In the fully adjusted multilevel model, females had higher odds of loneliness than males (OR = 1.88), and sexual-minority adolescents had higher odds than non-sexual-minority adolescents (OR = 2.81). Higher depressive symptom levels across late childhood and early adolescence were associated with greater odds of loneliness (OR = 1.29), and modest increases in conduct problems were also related to higher loneliness (OR = 1.12). The remaining symptom trajectories showed small or null associations after adjustment. The results from the present study suggest that, despite growing concern about an "epidemic" of loneliness, the experience is unevenly distributed by mid-adolescence, with elevated risk among female adolescents, sexual-minority adolescents, and those with heightened depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.