Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005613›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Resuscitation 2025 congress: launch of the resuscitation guidelines, scientific advances, education, equity, and innovation across the chain of survival.

Nino Fijačko, Gavin D Perkins, Tatyana Pinniger, Ahmed Elshaer, Giuseppe Ristagno, Priyanka Modi, Jacqueline Eleonora Ek, Roos Edgar, Kristin Alm-Kruse, Sergio Cazorla-Calderón and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nino FijačkoUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom.
Tatyana PinnigerEuropean Resuscitation Council, Niel, Belgium.
Ahmed ElshaerAnaesthetics Department, Perth Royal Infirmary, Perth, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe RistagnoUniversity of Milan, and Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, Italy.
Priyanka ModiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, SGT Medical College, Hospital and Research Institute, Gurugram, India.
Jacqueline Eleonora EkDepartment of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Roos EdgarDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Kristin Alm-KruseDivision of Prehospital Services and Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sergio Cazorla-CalderónUniversity of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.
Johannes WittigResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Theresa Mariero OlasveengenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital and Division of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Robert GreifFaculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Congress - Resuscitation 2025 was held in Rotterdam as a fully in-person international meeting and served as the official launch platform for the ERC Resuscitation Guidelines 2025. The congress brought together nearly 3000 participants from 77 countries, representing a multidisciplinary community of clinicians, educators, scientists, survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and their co-survivors, policymakers, and system leaders. The programme featured guideline presentations, scientific abstract sessions, debates, poster discussions, workshops, networking activities, and industry exhibitions, reflecting the breadth of modern resuscitation research and practice. Core themes included epidemiology, systems of care, basic and advanced life support, post-resuscitation management, paediatric and neonatal care, ethics, education, and first aid. Sessions also addressed innovations such as physiology-guided advanced life support, extracorporeal resuscitation, and digital or AI-based detection and decision-support tools, as well as personalised post-cardiac arrest care. Late-breaking studies presented findings on neurophysiology, temperature management, double-sequence defibrillation, and early hypothermia. The congress also highlighted survivorship, rehabilitation, co-survivor perspectives, diversity and equity in resuscitation outcomes, and global training capacity. Young ERC initiatives supported mentorship, research collaboration, and career development for students and early-career professionals. Overall, the congress demonstrated the growing maturity and complexity of resuscitation science by integrating clinical evidence, systems innovation, ethics, education, and equity, while providing a collaborative platform to shape future research priorities and support implementation of the new ERC Guidelines across diverse healthcare contexts.

Indexed as

Advanced life supportArtificial intelligenceBasic life supportCardiac arrestDiversity and inclusionEquity in healthcareERC Guidelines 2025European Resuscitation CouncilExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationInnovation in resuscitationInternational congress: early-careerLate-breaking scienceLow-resource settingsNeonatal life supportPaediatric life supportPost-resuscitation careResuscitation 2025Resuscitation educationSurvivorshipSystems of care

Identifiers

PMID42005613
PMCPMC13091303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.