ArticleHealth science reports2026
Social Media Use and Psychological and Nutritional Well-Being in Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although previous studies suggest that social media may influence individuals of different ages, comprehensive and objective research focusing on older adults remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the associations between social media use on the well-being of older adults using objective assessment methods. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 153 adults aged 50 years and older. Objective social media use was assessed through smartphone screen-time records covering at least the previous 2 weeks, while participants also reported their estimated daily usage durations. Psychological and nutritional well-being were evaluated using validated scales: the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, PHQ-9 for depression, GAD-7 for anxiety, and MNA-SF for nutritional status. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests, correlation analyses, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: The mean age of participants was 64.2 years (SD = 9.7), and 43.1% were female. The majority of participants (78.4%) had normal nutritional status, but loneliness (53.6%), depression (62.7%), and anxiety (66.2%) were relatively high. The median daily social media use was 90 min (IQR = 27-178). Older participants spent significantly less time on social media ( Conclusions: While higher income was associated with greater use, social media engagement was not linked to adverse psychological or nutritional outcomes. These findings suggest that social media use was not significantly associated with adverse psychological or nutritional well-being among adults aged 50 years and older.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.