Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005683›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Utilizing and Optimizing Forecasting Models for Nursing Demand: A Narrative Review.

Kalpana Singh, Liyan Ajit D Souza, Ananth Nazarene, Amane Mounia, Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr, Ahmad Mousa, Rebecca Rejo George, Abdulqadir J Nahwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kalpana SinghNursing & Midwifery Research Department Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2273-5062
Liyan Ajit D SouzaHamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3582-4953
Ananth NazareneMental Health Services, Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6096-2303
Amane MouniaNursing Professions and Health Techniques Marrakech Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9273-4284
Mahmoud Abdelwahab KhedrCollege of Nursing Hafr Albatin University Hafr Albatin Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3437-3764
Ahmad MousaSchool of Nursing & Midwifery Edith Cowan University & Centre for Nursing Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group Australia.
Rebecca Rejo GeorgeFatima College of Health Sciences Ajman UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-6556
Abdulqadir J NahwanNursing & Midwifery Research Department Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-4119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurately forecasting nursing demand is essential for effective workforce planning in the context of increasing patient volumes and the growing complexity of healthcare systems. Reliable forecasting supports optimal staffing, enhances patient care quality, and reduces operational risks. However, traditional forecasting approaches are increasingly challenged by evolving clinical demands, rising chronic disease burden, and rapid technological advancements. Aim: This narrative review aimed to (1) map existing models used for predicting nursing demand, (2) identify key predictive methodologies, data inputs, and evaluation metrics, and (3) highlight existing gaps and implications for healthcare policy and workforce management. Methods: A comprehensive narrative literature synthesis was conducted, examining a range of forecasting approaches used in healthcare settings. The review included time-series models (e.g., ARIMA), machine learning techniques (e.g., Random Forest and Long Short-Term Memory [LSTM]), and hybrid modeling frameworks. Relevant studies were analyzed to compare methodologies, performance, and applicability in nursing workforce prediction. Results: The findings indicate that advanced forecasting models, particularly machine learning and hybrid approaches, improve prediction accuracy and enable proactive workforce planning. However, significant limitations were identified, including inconsistencies in data quality, lack of standardized validation methods, and limited contextual adaptation. Additionally, many models fail to incorporate dynamic factors such as patient acuity, seasonal variations, and unit-specific characteristics, which restrict their real-world applicability. Conclusion: Forecasting models hold substantial potential to enhance nursing workforce planning, but their effectiveness depends on methodological rigor, high-quality data infrastructure, and organizational readiness. Future efforts should focus on integrating dynamic healthcare variables and improving model validation to ensure reliable and context-sensitive predictions. This review provides guidance for researchers, healthcare administrators, and policymakers in developing evidence-informed and sustainable nursing workforce strategies.

Indexed as

forecasting modelshealthcare managementnurse staffingnursing demandpredictive model methodologiesworkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID42005683
PMCPMC13087523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.