ArticleHealth science reports2026
Utilizing and Optimizing Forecasting Models for Nursing Demand: A Narrative Review.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately forecasting nursing demand is essential for effective workforce planning in the context of increasing patient volumes and the growing complexity of healthcare systems. Reliable forecasting supports optimal staffing, enhances patient care quality, and reduces operational risks. However, traditional forecasting approaches are increasingly challenged by evolving clinical demands, rising chronic disease burden, and rapid technological advancements. Aim: This narrative review aimed to (1) map existing models used for predicting nursing demand, (2) identify key predictive methodologies, data inputs, and evaluation metrics, and (3) highlight existing gaps and implications for healthcare policy and workforce management. Methods: A comprehensive narrative literature synthesis was conducted, examining a range of forecasting approaches used in healthcare settings. The review included time-series models (e.g., ARIMA), machine learning techniques (e.g., Random Forest and Long Short-Term Memory [LSTM]), and hybrid modeling frameworks. Relevant studies were analyzed to compare methodologies, performance, and applicability in nursing workforce prediction. Results: The findings indicate that advanced forecasting models, particularly machine learning and hybrid approaches, improve prediction accuracy and enable proactive workforce planning. However, significant limitations were identified, including inconsistencies in data quality, lack of standardized validation methods, and limited contextual adaptation. Additionally, many models fail to incorporate dynamic factors such as patient acuity, seasonal variations, and unit-specific characteristics, which restrict their real-world applicability. Conclusion: Forecasting models hold substantial potential to enhance nursing workforce planning, but their effectiveness depends on methodological rigor, high-quality data infrastructure, and organizational readiness. Future efforts should focus on integrating dynamic healthcare variables and improving model validation to ensure reliable and context-sensitive predictions. This review provides guidance for researchers, healthcare administrators, and policymakers in developing evidence-informed and sustainable nursing workforce strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.