Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42005727›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Automated deep learning segmentation and planning for left-sided breast radiotherapy with minimised adaptations based on dose, TCP and NTCP criteria.

Niels van Acht, Andreea Ciobotaru, Maurice van der Sangen, Jacqueline Theuws, Johanna Bluemink, Coen Hurkmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels van AchtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Andreea CiobotaruDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Maurice van der SangenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline TheuwsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Johanna BlueminkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Coen HurkmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Deep learning segmentation (DLS) and planning (DLP) models in radiotherapy treatment planning increase consistency and reduce planning time. However, many DL segmentations and plans are manually adjusted. The clinical relevance of these adjustments remains underexplored. This study assesses the clinical relevance of adjustments made to DLS and DLP and proposes a workflow that could optimise treatment planning time while remaining clinically similar. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 101 clinically approved structures and treatment plans (CS-CP) for left-sided node-negative breast cancer was conducted, comparing them with three alternative plans varying in DL influence: unadjusted DLS and DLP (DLS-DLP), clinically approved structures with DLP (CS-DLP), and clinically approved targets with DLS organs-at-risk, referred to as proposed structures, and DLP (PS-DLP). Plans were evaluated based on clinical goals, tumour control probability, and normal tissue complication probability. A new workflow, with four planning routes, was designed to assess time savings. Results: 88 % of CS-CP plans met all clinical goals, compared to 43 % (DLS-DLP), 59 % (CS-DLP) and 60 % (PS-DLP). Statistically significant differences were found for most evaluation criteria, with only the D Conclusion: The clinical relevance of DLS and DLP adjustments was assessed, revealing that plans generated by a fully DL workflow (DLS-DLP) were clinically acceptable for 43 % of patients. The proposed workflow optimised planning time, enhancing efficiency.

Indexed as

Deep learning planningDeep learning segmentationDosimetryNormal tissue complication probabilityRadiotherapy planningTumour control probability

Identifiers

PMID42005727
PMCPMC13091286

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.