ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Liver fibrosis biomarkers as a prognostic tool beyond the defining components in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the multisystem nature of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome, hepatic dysfunction markers are rarely included. We evaluated whether two noninvasive liver fibrosis scores (LFSs)-the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS)-independently predict all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in CKM, and whether they complement CKM staging to better capture mortality risk heterogeneity. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018 (n=32,197) and the UK Biobank (n=88,590). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) selected a parsimonious covariate set for the baseline Cox model, to which FIB-4 or NFS was added separately. Incremental prognostic value was assessed by discrimination (C-index, time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), model fit (likelihood ratio test [LRT]), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). We also compared the original CKM staging with a CKM-Liver staging that added an intermediate-to-high fibrosis-risk indicator. Results: Survival declined with higher LFS, and both scores independently predicted ACM and CVM. Adding FIB-4 or NFS modestly improved discrimination and model fit (ACM ΔC-index=0.009 and 0.008; LRT Conclusions: FIB-4 and NFS are readily accessible and independent predictors of mortality in CKM. Adding LFSs provides modest but consistent incremental prognostic value and refines risk stratification. LFSs may serve as practical, complementary markers within a multi-organ CKM risk assessment framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.