ArticleBMJ public health2026
Intersectional inequalities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in Sweden: a retrospective population-based cohort study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake according to region of birth: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Sweden.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During the global pandemic, the elderly, foreign-born and socioeconomically deprived experienced disproportionately higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality than general populations. However, these groups have typically been analysed in isolation, without considering how social factors jointly influenced COVID-19-related health. Thus, the aim of this study is to quantify intersectional inequalities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in Sweden. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, national registers were used to identify 35-to-100-year-old residents of Sweden in January 2020 (n=6 014 164), tracking COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths (International Classification of Diseases-10 Codes U07.1/U07.2, plus B34.2 for deaths) until December 2022. Intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy was applied with logistic regression, nesting individuals within intersectional strata based on age, gender, migrant status and region of origin, and income. Measures of discriminatory accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or AUC), predicted probabilities and random effects were calculated. Results: During follow-up, 77 844 (1.29%) individuals were hospitalised and 18 126 (0.30%) died due to COVID-19. Intersectional models explained 2.22% of the variation in mortality (AUC=0.835) vs 0.60% in hospitalisations (AUC=0.728). Predicted probabilities were lowest in 35-44-year-old Swedish-born women with high income at 0.19% (95% CI 0.16% to 0.21%) for hospitalisations, and 0.01% (95% CI 0.01% to 0.02%) for mortality; and highest among 85-100-year-old foreign-born men from the Global South with low income at 14.85% (95% CI 12.84% to 17.10%) for hospitalisations, and 8.25% (95% CI 6.32% to 10.70%) for mortality. Random effects indicated wider income inequalities in both outcomes in the youngest and narrower in the oldest, native-born and foreign-born groups from the Global North. Conclusions: Intersectional inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes consistently increased with age, decreased with income and were higher for men and foreign-born individuals. The results emphasise the need to consider universal public health strategies to reach vulnerable populations during a pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.