ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Association between baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and short-term hearing recovery after glucocorticoid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for day-7 hearing recovery following oral glucocorticoid therapy in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 214 patients with unilateral ISSNHL who were admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery between 2022 and 2025. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between baseline NLR and day-7 recovery status (recovered vs. non-recovered), and E-values were calculated to evaluate the potential impact of unmeasured confounders. Stratified analyses and interaction tests were performed to examine potential effect modifications across predefined subgroups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess predictive performance, and the optimal NLR threshold was determined using the Youden index. To address potential overfitting and improve reproducibility, internal validation and calibration of the NLR-only model were performed using bootstrap resampling, including the optimism-corrected AUC, Brier score, calibration-in-the-large, and calibration slope. Results: A higher NLR was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of day-7 hearing recovery. In the fully adjusted model, the odds ratio (OR) for NLR was 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-0.53]. The E-value was 2.54 (upper limit of the 95% CI, 2.09), supporting the robustness to unmeasured confounding factors. This association was generally consistent across subgroup analyses. ROC analysis showed strong predictive accuracy, with an apparent AUC of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95). The optimal NLR cut-off was 4.59, with a specificity of 97.66% and a sensitivity of 80.23%. Bootstrap internal validation demonstrated minimal overfitting (optimism-corrected AUC 0.90) and satisfactory calibration (optimism-corrected calibration-in-the-large = 0.0039; calibration slope = 1.0032). Conclusion: Baseline NLR is a simple and readily available biomarker that predicts day-7 hearing recovery following oral glucocorticoid therapy in patients with ISSNHL. An elevated NLR is associated with a lower probability of recovery, supporting its potential utility for early risk stratification; nevertheless, external validation in independent cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.