Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42006916›Full record

ReviewClinical neurophysiology practice2026

Home-based transcranial static magnetic field stimulation - concept, development, and clinical applications: IFCN handbook chapter.

Claudia Ammann, Vanesa Soto-León

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudia AmmannHM CINAC (Centro Integral de Neurociencias Abarca Campal), Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
Vanesa Soto-LeónFENNSI Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, 45004 Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have significantly advanced neuroscience research and clinical practice. However, these approaches can involve costly equipment (particularly TMS) and varying degrees of technical complexity, especially for protocols requiring precise targeting. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) has recently emerged as a novel, accessible alternative. This technique uses a simple, constant magnetic field-typically generated by a neodymium magnet-to modulate cortical excitability without electrical input, or perceptible sensation. While static magnets have long been associated with pseudoscientific practices, rigorous studies since 2011 have established the physiological effects of tSMS, demonstrating its capacity to transiently reduce cortical excitability in humans. The simplicity, portability, and excellent safety profile of tSMS make it especially well-suited for home-based applications and long-duration protocols. Although its modulatory effects tend to be modest and transient, recent research indicates that longer stimulation durations can extend the effects, and its predominantly inhibitory action may be advantageous for specific clinical targets. While the static nature of the magnetic field limits depth penetration, ongoing innovations may help address this constraint. Overall, tSMS represents a low-cost, well-tolerated, and practical addition to the NIBS toolkit, with growing potential to support individualized neuromodulation strategies in both research and therapeutic settings.

Indexed as

Cortical excitabilityDisease-modifying therapyHome-based neuromodulationMovement disordersNon-invasive brain stimulationTranscranial static magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42006916
PMCPMC13091538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.