ArticleBrain & spine2026
Brachial- and lumbosacral plexus tumours zone system for surgery brain and spine nerve edition.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Operating on plexus related neoplasia involves a higher risk for morbidity and functional deterioration. For neck-and intrapelvic plexus tumours (tu) a variety of approaches exist, with fluent transition to standard spine, abdominal and thoracic surgery. We described a systematic approach selection for complex multi compartmental lumbosacral plexus tumours before. Based on this decision pathway we now suggest a unifying classification system, applicable for both brachial- and lumbosacral plexus. Objective: To introduce a unifying zone system for brachial- and lumbosacral plexus to ease adequate approach selection for simple and complex nerve associated plexus tumours. The system further refines our approach selection process for these patients. Method: Based on MRI, localisation, tumour boundaries and their correlation to landmarks define core zones that facilitate the choice of one or the combination of different appropriate approach/es: in brachial plexus tumour BP Zone I-IV with spinal (Spi), foraminal (For), lateral thoracic wall (Ltw) extension; in lumbosacral tumour LSP Zone I-III with spinal (Spi), foraminal (For), femoral (Fem), Sci (sciatic) extension. Result: The system works to easily classify plexus tumours in groups and suggests appropriate approach choices, even involving combinations of surgical accesses not described previously. Conclusion: We propose the "Zone plus extension Plexus tu classification system" derived from tumour imaging to classify brachial- and lumbosacral plexus tumours prior to surgery. The necessary decision making inherently suggests approach combinations for tu removal. The classification thus aids to secure adequate exposure to prevent untoward surgical compromises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.