ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026
Factors affecting quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with coronary heart disease: effects of the cardiac rehabilitation nursing model.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze factors influencing the quality of life (QoL) of elderly patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to evaluate the clinical value a cardiac rehabilitation nursing model.
methodsThis randomized controlled trial assigned 112 elderly PCI patients to a control group (routine care) or an observation group (cardiac rehabilitation model), both receiving 6-month interventions. Outcome indicators were then compared between the two original groups at preoperative, 7-day postoperative, and 6-month follow-up time points. The control group was further stratified by post-PCI QoL scores into good and poor QOL subgroups for multivariate analysis.
resultsAge, smoking, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score, and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 were identified as independent risk factors for poor QoL (
conclusionAge, smoking history, SDS scores, and PSGL-1 are key predictors of postoperative QoL. The cardiac rehabilitation nursing model significantly outperformed routine care by improving patients' QoL, psychological state, cardiac function, and inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.