Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007101›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2026

Uterine microbiota dynamics and new therapeutic opportunities in gynecological diseases.

Heyuan Tang, Meng Wu, Siyuan Tan, Cheng Liu, Yulan Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heyuan TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
Meng WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
Siyuan TanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
Cheng LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
Yulan CuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional view holds that the uterus is a sterile environment. However, with the increased development of molecular biology technologies, this classical theory has been re-examined. Increasing evidence shows that a low-biomass, uniquely structured microecosystem exists in the healthy uterus. Its composition and dynamic changes are crucial in maintaining endometrial homeostasis, regulating immune responses, and influencing embryo implantation. Uterine microecological imbalance is associated with different gynecological diseases, such as chronic endometritis, endometriosis, and uterine-related tumors. This paper systematically reviews the compositional features of the uterine microecology and the dynamic changes in bacterial communities, as well as summarizes the evidence linking these changes to major gynecological diseases. This work examines current treatment and intervention strategies including antibiotics, probiotics, uterine cavity colonization, and fecal microbiota transplantation, and discusses their potential clinical value and methodological challenges. A deeper investigation of the relationship between uterine microecology and gynecological diseases is expected to provide new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the precise diagnosis and treatment of gynecological disorders.

Indexed as

gynecological diseasesLactobacillusmicrobial dynamicsprobiotic therapyUterine microbiota

Identifiers

PMID42007101
PMCPMC13090897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.