SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Effects of digital health interventions on objectively measured physical activity during the perinatal period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Insufficient physical activity is prevalent among perinatal women, and digital health interventions offer a promising avenue to promote engagement in physical activity within this population. However, previous studies have relied heavily on self-reported data, lacking a systematic synthesis based on objective measurements. This study aims to systematically evaluate the effects of digital health interventions on objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in perinatal women. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 20, 2025. Fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,101 participants were included. The Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool was used to assess bias risk, random-effects models were employed to pool effect sizes, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Results: The meta-analysis showed that, following the exclusion of outliers via sensitivity analysis, digital health interventions significantly increased daily step counts (MD = 0.68, Conclusion: Digital health interventions can effectively and robustly enhance daily baseline activity levels in perinatal women, with the observed increments potentially reaching the minimal effective dose for improving metabolic health. However, current intervention designs face challenges in driving high-intensity behavior change and disrupting sedentary habits. Future research should explore more targeted and personalized intervention strategies. Systematic review registration: This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero), identifier CRD420261280936.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.