Quantification of the absolute abundance of the jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota of pigs using spike-in control.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Nutritional needs of non-essential amino acids for intestinal health and growth performance of nursery pigs fed diets without soybean meal.Journal of animal science · 2026
   Article
2. Provision of porcine milk oligosaccharides to support the weaning transition in nursery pigs fed diets including bovine milk co-products.Journal of animal science · 2026
   Article
3. Intestinal microbiota in nursery pigs: comments on anatomical location, spatial niches, and approaches to data interpretation.Microbiome research reports · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as