Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007391›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

A comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for predicting chicken egg weight from egg quality traits.

Ashenafi Getachew Megersa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ashenafi Getachew MegersaSchool of Animal and Range Sciences, Haramaya University, P. O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of artificial neural network (ANN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boost regression (GBoost), random forest regression (RFR), support vector regression (SVR), and classification and regression trees (CART) algorithms for developing predictive models to estimate the egg weight of Bovan brown chickens in Ethiopia based on egg quality traits. Data were collected from 600 consumption eggs at the Haramaya University poultry farm, with 300 eggs from each of the cage and deep litter production systems. The dataset included egg weight (EW) and ten egg quality metrics. Descriptive statistics revealed the strongest correlations with egg weight were albumen weight (AW) and egg length (EL), with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.86 and 0.64, respectively. Performance among the models varied, with GBoost achieving the highest predictive accuracy. It yielded the highest coefficient of determination (R² = 0.960), the lowest root means square error (1.112), Akaike information criterion (AIC = 1834.394), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC = 1847.544), as well as the highest correlation (0.98) between observed and predicted values. In contrast, the CART model demonstrated the weakest overall performance. A relative importance analysis identified AW as the most significant predictor across all models, accounting for 96.28 % in CART, 80.56 % in GBoost, 72.69 % in RFR, 30.6 % in ANN, 29.9 % in SVR, and 29.1 % in KNN. The results indicate that the GBoost algorithm is a reliable and superior method for predicting egg weight. This study suggests that, with the application of this model, egg producers can effectively anticipate egg weight based on key egg quality characteristics.

Indexed as

Egg quality traitsEgg weight predictionMachine learning algorithmsPredictive performanceRelative importance

Identifiers

PMID42007391
PMCPMC13090620

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.