Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007725›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026

Daily Body (Dis-)Satisfaction and Dietary Restriction in Women Across the Eating Disorder Spectrum.

Michaela R Buehler, Ann-Kathrin Arend, Julia Reichenberger, Jens Blechert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michaela R BuehlerDepartment of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8330-7176
Ann-Kathrin ArendDepartment of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-9328
Julia ReichenbergerDepartment of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-410X
Jens BlechertDepartment of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-109X

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research of AustriaH2020 European Research Council ERC-StG-2014 639445 NewEat
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBody dissatisfaction is a key risk factor in eating disorder development: It is theorized to promote dietary restriction, thereby contributing to symptom onset. Evidence for this pathway primarily comes from cross-sectional or multi-wave questionnaire studies in bulimia nervosa (BN) and anorexia nervosa (AN). Fewer studies have tested day-to-day links between body dissatisfaction and dietary restriction, which would indicate their temporal relationships. Using a daily diary design, we examined prospective day-to-day associations between these two symptoms across four eating disorder (ED) groups and a non-ED control group (CG).

methodOne hundred eighty one female participants (14-60 years; M = 28.2, SD = 11.4) were recruited from German-speaking countries (96% German or Austrian nationals). The sample included patients with BN (n = 40), binge-eating/purging type AN (ANbp, n = 23), restricting type AN (ANr, n = 24), binge-eating disorder (BED, n = 36), as well as a non-ED CG (n = 58). Daily body dissatisfaction and dietary restriction were assessed on eight consecutive evenings. Day-to-day associations were tested using multilevel (mixed-effects) lagged regression models.

resultsIn patients with BN and ANbp, days with higher body dissatisfaction preceded days with higher dietary restriction. This association was not observed in patients with ANr, BED, or in the non-ED CG. Dietary restriction did not predict next day's body dissatisfaction. DISCUSSION: Prospective links between body dissatisfaction and restriction mainly characterize patients with BN and ANbp. Hence, intervention targets at both the group level and the symptom level (body dissatisfaction rather than dietary restriction) seem necessary. In these subgroups, intervening on days characterized by high body dissatisfaction may help reduce dietary restriction on the following day.

Indexed as

Body DissatisfactionBody ImageFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaBody SatisfactionBulimia NervosaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultambulatory assessmentanorexia nervosa binge‐eating/purging typebody imagebulimia nervosadaily diary analysis

Identifiers

PMID42007725
PMCPMC13446263

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.