Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007733›Full record

ReviewHLA2026

Recommendations for HLA Genotyping Data Standards and Clinical Laboratory Staffing Considerations.

Eric Spierings, Nicholas K Brown, Katy Latham, James Robinson, Mark Melchers, Medhat Askar, Gerald P Morris, Eric Weimer, Martin Maiers, Abeer Madbouly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eric SpieringsMatchis Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9441-1019
Nicholas K BrownDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-2315
Katy LathamHistocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood & Transplant, London, UK.
James RobinsonAnthony Nolan Research Institute, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-5944
Mark MelchersWorld Marrow Donor Association-WMDA Office, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Medhat AskarHealth Sector and College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Gerald P MorrisDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-4453
Eric WeimerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-5724
Martin MaiersCIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-2064
Abeer MadboulyMHC Therapeutics Bioconsulting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Integrated Exchange and Storage of Current- and Future-Generation Immunogenomic DataR01AI128775 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JILL Allison HOLLENBACH, STEVEN JOHN MACK · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
NIH HHS R01AI128775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advances in HLA genotyping technology and the massive amounts of associated data have created a demand for better and more efficient laboratory data management practices. However, while some standards have been developed, there is a need for comprehensive guidelines that include all laboratory data-related processes such as messaging, storage and retention, documentation, reporting, validation and quality control. An important consideration in developing these recommendations is the feasibility of application in a laboratory setting without posing a substantial staff and cost burden for implementation and long-term maintenance and the availability of publicly available tools. This article presents evidence-based recommendations for multiple laboratory general data practices, focusing on HLA genotyping data and associated meta-data. These recommendations are compiled by experts in the fields of histocompatibility and immunogenetics (H&I) and representation from multiple H&I worldwide professional society leadership with the long-term goal of adopting these recommendations in future laboratory accreditation requirements.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensLaboratories, ClinicalGenotypeHumansQuality ControlHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID42007733
PMCPMC13094400

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.