ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2026
Recovery and Survival of Prototheca Microalgae During Wastewater Treatment Process.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prototheca are unicellular, non-pigmented, yeast-like microalgae widely distributed in natural and anthropogenic environments. While typically saprophytic, these organisms are the only plant species known to have emerged as opportunistic pathogens for vertebrate animals including humans. The algae have been recognised as ubiquitous inhabitants of domestic and municipal sewage, considered as point sources of Prototheca contamination in natural aquatic systems. These observations, however, have been based on data from a very limited number of historical studies. The purpose of this work was to readdress the question of wastewater as a habitat for Prototheca, using a new and refined experimental methodology, and in light of the recently updated taxonomy and nomenclature of the Prototheca genus. Over a three-month period, 96 samples were collected from three municipal wastewater treatment plants, at four different stages of the treatment process. The algae were recovered from 74 samples, which translates into an overall prevalence of 78.1%. The highest Prototheca population was found in raw sewage, and decreased progressively with each purification stage. The Prototheca cell count in the effluent was 100-fold lower than in the untreated sewage, resulting in an algal removal efficiency of up to 99.9%. The occurrence of Prototheca in treated wastewater suggests that wastewater treatment plants may act as a pathway for the release of these algae into receiving natural environments. In both influent and effluent, species distribution was dominated by Prototheca species previously reported as pathogenic, with P. wickerhamii detected most frequently. The study concludes by advocating for regular monitoring of pre- and post-treatment wastewater for Prototheca species and emphasising the need for guideline limits on their acceptable levels at both treatment stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.