Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42007976›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology2026

Optimal treatment selection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy.

Chen-Ta Chi, Yi-Hsiang Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen-Ta ChiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsiang HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. yhhuang@vghtpe.gov.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-5241-5425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has revolutionized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management, necessitating personalized strategies in current guidelines. Despite curative intent for early-stage HCC, recurrence rates remain high. While antiviral therapy mitigates risk, no adjuvant therapy is currently established for high-risk patients. Artificial intelligence (AI) models now offer promising tools for predicting post-resection recurrence.For intermediate-stage HCC, the 7-11 criteria and radiological patterns guide treatment selection. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has already improved objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) over TACE monotherapy. Furthermore, the Phase III EMERALD-1 and LEAP-012 trials demonstrated that TACE plus immunotherapy significantly extends PFS. The TALENTACE trial further investigates this synergy, evaluating the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combination therapy to optimize outcomes in this population.Achieving a cancer-free state through curative conversion-utilizing liver-directed, systemic, or combination therapies-remains a primary clinical goal. While ICIs are the standard for advanced HCC, reliable biomarkers are still lacking. Emerging evidence suggests that the tumor microenvironment, genetic signatures, and the gut microbiota-metabolite axis are significantly associated with ICI outcomes. Integrating these complex biological features through machine learning holds the potential to identify robust biomarkers, ultimately refining immunotherapy selection and patient prognosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceChemoembolization, TherapeuticCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAIBiomarkerHCCImmunotherapyOptimal treatment

Identifiers

PMID42007976
PMCPMC13407441

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.